So, you need to implement a video watermarking solution. How do you decide which solution and vendor are the right ones for you?
When choosing a content protection partner for video watermarking, finding the right solution for your needs is important. Many factors come into play, but here are key questions to ask potential vendors to ensure their watermarking solution is viewer-friendly and pirate-unfriendly, provides a universal, cost-efficient approach and actually works!
Q1. Is the watermark imperceptible to the viewer?
Video watermarking must be virtually imperceptible to the viewer. Security is highly important, but it cannot compromise the viewer experience. A good watermarking solution is virtually imperceptible, which not only doesn't impact viewer experience, but also makes it harder for a pirate to discover and circumvent.
Q2. Is the watermark robust against real-world pirate attacks?
In an era of AI-powered video manipulation, pirate attacks are increasingly technically sophisticated, with professional pirates motivated by high-margin income from selling stolen content. Pirates constantly invest in new techniques to circumvent security, and live sports are the most lucrative targets. Deploying a watermarking technology resilient to various manipulations (including with the use of AI) that adapts in response to attacks in real-time is crucial for protecting this content. Therefore, the watermarking solution must be offered as a managed and supported service rather than an off-the-shelf product or set of tools.
A data-driven AI-assisted approach is crucial for a watermarking vendor. Collecting and analysing vast datasets while monitoring content globally at scale enables the vendor to generate valuable intelligence. This insight allows for accurate predictions of pirate countermeasures and the development of proactive solutions that stay ahead of emerging threats.
Q3. Is the watermark always embedded during playback for all content types?
If the watermark is displayed throughout the duration of the protected content playback, be it a live linear channel or VoD asset, then any capture of pirated content from that source should include the watermark and therefore deliver a result.
Conversely, if the watermark is only displayed intermittently during playback, the capture process will become more complex, as the content monitoring system will need to align video capture with the display time of the watermarking. Accordingly, the number of failed captures will inevitably be higher, and the extraction/identification process may require frequent manual intervention, resulting in higher costs.
Q4. Can the watermark be extracted from a short pirate video capture?
While performance varies depending on whether watermarking is deployed via client-side or server-side, the technology used should be purpose-built to extract watermarks rapidly from short clips to enable instant remediation – like revoking a pirate stream while a match is still live, before the broadcast’s value expires. By mastering short-extract detection, it ensures high-speed protection for both live and VOD content, while simultaneously stripping away the massive storage costs and reliability risks associated with capturing long, bulky video files.
Q5. Is the watermark deployable on all devices, including legacy STBs and OTT apps?
For broadcasters and service operators distributing content across multiple channels, it’s essential to ensure robust protection for valuable exclusive content across all client devices and platforms. Protecting an exclusive movie on OTT platforms offers limited value if pirates can still easily capture or restream it from an older broadcast device without fear of detection. Pirates will always identify the easiest way to steal content and exploit those distribution channels and devices. A universal watermarking solution deployable on all key devices will cover all the bases.
Continue reading: download the 10 Questions expert's guide to find out more
